Ram setu or the Adams Bridge.

Ramayana Scientific Dating Wrong?

ram setu dating

In other words there is no past, no present no future. Ramayana also described with unprecedented details about civilizations of humans, Vanara, Gradru, and Rakshasa. Adding to every number might have been a custom. Anyhow, we can approximate his longevity was around 11, years. Scientific analysis suggests they are. Rennel in retrieved from the same library called this area the area of the Rama Temple Many other maps in Schwartzberg's historical atlas and other sources call this area with various names like Koti, Sethubandha and Sethubandha Rameswaram along with others. People read your views so I am concerned that many people will get wrong message.

16 thoughts on “Ramayana Scientific Dating Wrong?”

Alan Lester saying that the rocks of the bridge is years-old while the sandbar is only years-old, suggesting that the rocks were brought from elsewhere. My purpose is served because the readers have taken the issue seriously and have referred to the original Epics. I have mentioned in my post this point as well as my views on This anomaly. It is all hogwash. Some of the sandbanks are dry and the sea around the area is very shallow, being only 1 to 10 meters 3 to 30 ft deep. In Sanskrit, it is said dasa varsha sahasrani, dasa varsha satanicha Ten times to thousand and ten times a hundred.

Are the ancient Hindu myths of a land bridge connecting India and Sri Lanka true? Scientific analysis suggests they are. The bridge is 50 km long and separates the Gulf of Mannar from the Palk Strait. Some of the sandbanks are dry and the sea around the area is very shallow, being only 1 to 10 meters 3 to 30 ft deep. The bridge was reportedly passable on foot up to the 15th century until storms deepened the channel. Geological evidence suggests that the bridge was a former land connection between India and Sri Lanka.

Scientific studies reveal that the bridge is made of limestone shoals and is a linear sequence of coral reefs. Instead, of now having set a direction to find out how such thing took place, these catholic followers are simply applying all forces and theories to falsify a fact.

Yet the presence of shoals below the bridge and their type indicate that they cannot be found in sea in the manner it exists at Ram Sethu. Ramasamy in claimed that, "Rama's bridge could only be 3, years old" and, "as the carbon dating of the beaches roughly matches the dates of Ramayana, its link to the epic needs to be explored".

However, one needs to note that the surveys which have come out with the year age for the bridge are based on the studies conducted on corals grown on the bridge itself and it has been argued that this represents only the age of what was measured, which is the corals. The bridge underneath the corals has been dated back to hundreds of thousands of years earlier.

A former director of the Geological Survey of India, S. Badrinarayanan, claims that such a natural formation would be impossible. He justifies the same by the presence of a loose sand layer under corals for the entire stretch.

Corals normally form above rocks. In connection with the canal project, the Madras High Court in its verdict stated that the Rama Sethu is a man-made structure. Geological and archaeological findings of Teri formations, a rich assemblage of Mesolithic-Microlithic tools and human fossils found on both sides of the bridge by the Department of Earth-Science in March are also quoted as evidence for manmade structure.

It was described very briefly about the happy life of the people of Kosala kingdom during the reign of Sri Rama. All were engaged in virtue. Rama was engaged in the kingship thus for Ten thousand years. Though the story contains minor variations compared to the story told in the Srimad Ramayana, those episodes describe the story of Sri Rama in full.

The Pandavas, after winning the Mahabharat war, ruled Hastinapur for 36 years and 8 months until the beginning of kaliyug in BC. Please do not be cynical as to the description of 10, years of ruling. We do not know exact age and the longevity of people of that age.

Thus, we will get 13, BC. That means atleast 15, years back Srimad Ramayana might have written. The problem seems to be that the two Ithihasas, which I take to be true, according to our present dating are separated by only a few thousand years,while according to Puranas and the Ithihasas themselves, they are separated by Aeons,one in Treta Yuga another in Dwapara which are separted by tens of thousands of years.

To me this anamoly is solved by the Cyclic view of Time by Indian Philosophy and we have arrived at our present dates with technology that is not adeqaute enough to measure them. Its just not convincing. Give solid analysis for your arguments, not hearsay. I have expressed the anomalies in the dates from various sources. I have mentioned in my post this point as well as my views on This anomaly. Reblogged this on primordialpassages and commented: Reblogged this on Hindu Internet Defence Force.

You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. C Asoka Vatika is also dated thus. The four Yuga Details.

Astrological magazine of B. Raman , february edition. On the other hand, the Indian or rather the Hindu legend behind this superbly curved sandstone bridge relates it to the epic Ramayana.

Thus, he was 25 years old at that time The Yugas are circular. That is Time goes around in Circles and is not forward moving. In other words there is no past, no present no future.

Time is a continuous flow. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here

Imsges: ram setu dating

ram setu dating

Nala Sethu visibly seen as a road from Rameswaram in India to Sri Lanka is the definite marine archeological evidence on existence of Rama, Vanaras, and Rakshasa civilizations.

ram setu dating

But no view would consider this, simply because then the religion of peace would win then. Ramayana and scriptures mention about the floating stones used by Hanuman and other Vanara Sena to build the Ram Setu connecting India and Srilanka at Rameswaram. Its just not convincing.

ram setu dating

From the perspective of science, lydia bright dating ben bridge might destroy the natural reefs which had existed for thousands of years. Ramasamy in claimed that, "Rama's bridge could only be 3, years old" ram setu dating, "as the carbon dating of the beaches roughly matches ram setu dating dates of Ramayana, its link to the epic needs to be explored". Science do not forget to mention that man evolved out of monkeys — but defeats Hindus to consider that Vanars were the in between form of the evolution the evidence present in those days. It is made of floating rocks that are found scattered across Rameswaram and scientific theories suggest that some volcanic rocks do float on water. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Since ram setu dating became a huge unbreakable fossil, it was not possible to make a passage, as a result a chain of islands are seen visibly and also through satellite. Instead, it is mistaken by western scholars as mythology, and fiction, while some others say it is nothing but an epic.